Latest from the CAP
Home » Development » PRC’s top Africa scholar: Africa should jump on the China bandwagon
PRC’s top Africa scholar: Africa should jump on the China bandwagon

PRC’s top Africa scholar: Africa should jump on the China bandwagon

In 2010, He Wenping, director of African Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, wrote an influential article for People’s Tribune in which she forcefully argued that “Africa should jump on the China bandwagon” and that China is helping Africa achieve democracy. Showing the continued relevance of the article, QS Theory (《求是》), the flagship theory journal of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, republished the article, “How Far Can China Go in Africa?” earlier this month as part of its spotlight on China-Africa relations. Read our full translation of the article below.

How far can China go in Africa?

A never-ending chorus of opinions has emerged in response to the closer ties between China and African countries that have been forged over the past decade. These opinions range from the negative (“China is stealing African resources” and “China is neocolonizing Africa”) to the positive (“China is promoting African development” and “China presents Africa with multiple opportunities”). But how exactly have China-Africa relations progressed? What actual influence does China have on African countries? In other words, how far can China go in Africa?

Relations between countries are often evaluated through time and space, much in the same way relations between people are analyzed. When examined from the two perspectives of history and geography, the ties China has with African countries seem rather weak. Looking at time, although China’s first encounter with Africa can be traced back to the second century BC, during the Han Dynasty, China did not begin having regular contact with African countries until after the establishment of the People’s Republic in 1949. China-Africa relations in the true sense of the phrase therefore span a mere 60 years. In contrast, the West stepped onto African soil in the 15th century and, through hundreds of years of colonial rule, has had a deep and wide-ranging impact on African politics, economies and cultures.

Looking at space, the West (especially European countries) is only separated from Africa by the Mediterranean Sea. European scholars of Africa I am acquainted with make casual remarks about going to conduct research in Africa as if doing so were as easy as taking a stroll through your backyard. In contrast, a vast distance separates China and Africa. Most Chinese people still think of Africa as a mystical, faraway land. In addition, Chinese scholars of Africa have very few opportunities to conduct research in Africa. On the rare occasions when they do get a chance to do fieldwork in Africa, their trips are usually sponsored by Western organizations, meaning that the researchers have to go through a difficult and lengthy process to get the trips approved.

Although China does not have the advantages of time and space in its relationship with African countries that the West enjoys in its relationship with Africa, the PRC’s relationship with Africa has gone from establishment to expansion to rapid, comprehensive development all within a short 60 years. The rapid progress that has been made in improving China-Africa relations can mostly be attributed to a tradition of mutual respect and a relationship based on mutual benefit. It is, however, also the result of the two sides’ shared history of suffering under colonial invasion and their common desire to subsist and thrive in an international environment dominated by the West.

China-Africa relations progressively improving

The first stage of China’s relationship with African countries, from the 1950s through the ’70s,was characterized by mutual anti-imperialist and anti-colonialist support in struggles for national liberation and efforts to consolidate national independence.

In the second stage of China-Africa relations, in the ’80s, economic elements of the relationship became more important, as China embarked on its reform and opening up policy. As such, this period saw an emphasis on the development, based on equality and mutual benefit, of various economic and technological cooperation programs between China and African countries.

The relationship between China and African countries entered its third stage in the ’90s with continued emphasis on strengthening trade relations and a new stress on the expansion of political, cultural, educational and other ties.

The establishment of the Forum on China–Africa Cooperation in 2000 provided a strategic platform for the systematization of exchanges, communication and cooperation between China and African countries. FOCAC has given new impetus to the development of China-Africa relations that has led to the rapid expansion of ties in recent years. In politics, for example, a new type of strategic China-Africa partnership has developed under the aegis of FOCAC, spurred on by frequent high-level exchange visits and mutual support in key international issues.

In economics, the volume of trade between China and African countries over the past decade has seen average annual growth of 35 percent, expanding from $10 billion in 2000 to $106.8 billion in 2008. China has surpassed the US to become Africa’s second-largest trading partner, ranking behind the EU. Chinese investment in Africa has risen from $50 million in 2001 to an annual average of $1 billion over the past few years. In addition, Africa is now China’s second-largest provider of overseas labor contracts. It is reported that there are close to a million Chinese people on the African continent, and there are already more than 1600 Chinese businesses operating in Africa.

In culture and education, a number of Confucius Institutes have been rapidly established across the continent with the aim of promoting Chinese culture and encouraging cultural exchange.  There has also been an increase in the number of Africans studying and engaged in various training programs in China.

Africans welcome China

The late-blooming yet rapidly progressing nature of China-Africa relations has naturally excited Africans and attracted Westerners’ attention. Although some African NGOs and media have criticized China-Africa relations, the mainstream of African public opinion about China’s growing ties with African countries is positive and constructive. Many shrewd Africans point out that although China seeks to procure natural resources in Africa, the way it goes about doing so is different from the West’s ongoing plunder of African resources. In contrast to the West, China provides African countries with infrastructure and large investments in exchange for resources.

It can be argued that through China’s rapid development over the past 30 years, African countries now have alternative means to solve their development problems beyond uncritical implementation of European and American prescriptions.

Africa should jump on the China bandwagon; when China gallops ahead, Africa will advance along with it. China’s involvement in Africa offers new prospects for the continent’s development. This may very well be the last opportunity for development Africa gets, so it should take full advantage of it.

Ordinary Africans welcome Chinese people’s arrival on the continent because they have directly benefitted from China’s trade with, and infrastructure provision to, Africa. When I was conducting research in Rwanda in February last year, I came across a young man who was roller-skating on the street. Alluding to Napoleon’s metaphor of China as a sleeping lion, he said he could feel the tremors China’ awakening roar caused around the world even from where he was all the way over in the Ugandan capital of Kigali.

These tremors can be a positive force, providing those who perceive them with new hope for change in an otherwise stagnant life. There are many African students studying Chinese and Chinese culture at the Confucius Institute attached to the Kigali Institute for Education. Some of these students told me that proficiency in Chinese would be a key competitive advantage in the job market as an increasing number of Chinese companies are investing and setting up factories in Rwanda.

I remember meeting a student named “Bretodeau” who was especially diligent and assiduous in studying Chinese. He said that his brother worked for a Chinese company, and that it was only through the salary that his brother got from this job that he had been able to go to school. He also told me that his brothers’ Chinese colleagues were all hardworking, friendly and kind, and held up a thumb towards me saying, “Chinese people are awesome!”

Dr.-He-Wenping

Dr. He Wenping is the director of African Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. She received her bachelor’s and master’s degrees in international relations and her doctorate in law from Peking University, and has been a visiting scholar at Yale University and the School of Oriental and African Studies in London. Her research interests include African countries’ foreign relations and human rights and democracy in Africa. Image by He Wenping.

China is promoting democracy in Africa

Of course, the ever closer ties between China and African countries unsettle Western countries that consider Africa their sphere of influence. Concerned over their dwindling slice of the African pie, some unscrupulous Western politicians, media organizations and NGOs turn a spotlight on each and every action taken by the Chinese government, Chinese companies and individual Chinese entrepreneurs in Africa.

This scrutinizing lens is meant to magnify any blemish in Chinese activities in Africa. A few cases of unprincipled corporate behavior have been played up as representative of all Chinese companies and routine cooperation in natural resource extraction has been described as “plundering Africa’s natural resources.” Similarly, Chinese companies’ success in winning contracts — the result of having to make efficient, low-priced bids in order to compete globally — has been attributed to dubious covert practices by the companies or behind the scenes negotiation by the Chinese government.

Criticism has also been leveled at the Chinese government’s unchanging insistence on non-interference in the internal affairs of other states. This principle has been vilified as underhanded support of so-called “rogue states” or “failed states.” Non-interference has also been painted as working to the detriment of Western countries’ efforts to promote democracy and human rights and fight against autocracy and corruption in Africa. This criticism of China seems reasonable at first blush, but close analysis shows that it is a strained interpretation of Chinese policy.

First, it is important to realize that a country’s development mainly depends on its own efforts, not on assistance by foreign entities. More important, however, is the fact that a country cannot achieve “democracy,” “human rights” and “good governance” within a short period by playing up adherence to them and blindly advocating them. Instead, democracy, human rights and governance can only be established after achieving a certain level of economic development, citizen education, legal awareness and democratic consciousness. In fact, Western countries only achieved the level of democracy that they have today after many centuries of hard work.

As such, China’s efforts to increase trade with Africa (China-Africa trade has contributed about 20 percent towards African economic growth in recent years), help Africa carry out large-scale infrastructure projects, increase Africans’ living standard, reduce poverty on the continent and train African personnel, among others, are in fact helping to form an economic and human resource basis for bringing about democracy and good governance in Africa. Ultimately, though, Africans will chose what development model they want for themselves.

Challenges remain

We should acknowledge the progress that has been made in China-Africa relations but we must also remain alert to potential crises and challenges, and search out and reflect on our shortcomings and the lessons we have learned. Doing so is essential if we are to comprehensively strengthen our relationships with African countries in a fast-changing international milieu and continue to find opportunities in an ever-changing Africa. We must remain cognizant of the fact that the recent rapid increase in our trade with Africa does not mean that our competitiveness on the continent has also increased. We must improve the composition of our trade, increase our cooperation in science and technology, boost our environmental protection and sustainable development capabilities, and train our legal and other experts, among other areas of improvement.

We still have a long way to go in increasing China’s political influence, economic competitiveness, moral standing and diplomatic rapport in Africa. Improving these aspects of our ties with African countries will provide us with many opportunities that we can take advantage of. There are also areas in which we need to reconsider our positions and learn from the experience of the West. More importantly, we should listen attentively to helpful suggestions and reminders from Africans.

 How far can China go in Africa?

The extent to which China can improve upon its relationships with African countries largely depends on our response to some sensitive issues that Africans are concerned about. These areas of concern include Chinese companies’ noncompliance with the laws and regulations of the areas they operate in, insufficient hiring of local labor for projects in Africa, anticompetitive practices that harm Africa’s infant textile industries, poor quality goods and lack of attention to corporate social responsibility.

Progress in China-Africa relations also hinges on the extent to which we genuinely consider African interests while conducting our activities on the continent and how earnestly and diligently we work to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes.

Another important factor that will determine whether or not China strengthens its relations with African countries is the extent to which we can increase mutual understanding. An Arabic proverb pithily explains the necessity of improving mutual affinity with our development partners: “If you want to go fast, go alone; if you want to go far, go together.”

On a research trip to Zambia, Ethiopia and Ghana in 2009, I met an African researcher who told me that the West’s understanding of Africa and Africa’s understanding of the West is deeper than the knowledge China and Africa have of each other. He also pointed out, however, that although European countries, the US and other Western countries have considerable knowledge about Africa, they do not support African interests.

China supports African interests, but, regrettably, it has an inadequate knowledge of Africa. An inadequate understanding of each other means that China’s relationships with African countries are prone to mutual suspicions and misgivings. This mutual lack of knowledge also allows the various attacks the West levels against China, such as the accusations that China is neocolonizing Africa or plundering African resources, to fester unchallenged. Africans’ lack of knowledge about China’s economic circumstances also makes it more likely for them to have unreasonable expectations for what China can do for them, which can lead to resentment when these expectations cannot be fulfilled.

Chinese also have a lack of understanding of Africa that lead to two major misconceptions. First is the assumption that there are easily accessible opportunities to make a fortune across the African continent, which leads some to invest without first carrying out appropriate feasibility studies. The second misconception is the reverse assumption – that Africa is synonymous with poverty and unrest, which makes some unwilling to invest in the continent.

Mutual understanding between China and African countries cannot be achieved instantaneously. Instead, it is a progressive endeavor that requires continuous effort from both sides. For its part, China needs to establish a China-Africa research fund to support and encourage Chinese researchers and institutes that focus on Africa to conduct field-based research on the continent. African countries should also increase their funding for research institutes and think tanks that specialize in Chinese affairs, and capitalize on the potential and cultural bridging capabilities of African scholars that return to their countries after having studied in China.

In sum, it is only through continuously strengthening mutual understanding that China-Africa relations can progress.

中国在非洲还能走多远?

  近十年来,随着中非关系的快速发展,有关中非关系的国际舆论可谓层出不穷。其中既有负面的“中国新殖民主义论”、“中国掠夺非洲资源论”,也有正面的“中国促进非洲发展论”和“中国机遇论”。那么,中非关系如今究竟处于什么样的发展阶段,中国在非洲的实际影响究竟有多大?换句话说,中国在非洲到底还能走多远?

  如同衡量人与人之间的关系一样,我们也常常用时间和空间这两个维度来衡量国与国之间的关系。和西方与非洲的关系相比,中非关系在这两个维度上似乎都不占优势。从时间维 度看,虽然中非间最早的接触可以追溯到公元前2世纪我国的汉代,但真正意义上以及经常性的中非交往则始于1949年新中国成立以后,时间跨度也就短短的60 年。而西方则从15世纪开始,就踏上了非洲的土地,在非洲进行了数百年的殖民统治,其政治、经济和文化的影响可谓相当广泛和深厚。从空间维度看,西方(特别是欧洲国家)与非洲仅隔地中海相望,感觉上常把非洲当成自家的后院。我认识的一些欧洲的非洲问题学者谈起去非洲调研,似乎真如同到自家后院散步一样,透着抬腿就走般的轻松和随意。相比而言,中国与非洲则在地理上相距万里。大多数中国人仍把非洲看成一个遥远和神秘的大陆。中国的非洲问题学者更是少有机会到非洲调研。偶有机会,也大多是借助西方的财力资助,要经过长期和艰苦的课题论证和筹划方能成行。

  不过,另一方面,虽然在时间和空间的维度上中国并不比西方占优势,但基于共同的遭受殖民侵略的痛苦历史记忆,以及现当代在西方主导的国际体系中求生存和求发展的共同发展诉求,更重要的是,秉承相互尊重和平等互利的原则,现当代的中国与非洲国家的关系在短短的60年里走过了建立、发展和全方位快速发展的三个阶段。在20世纪50年代到70 年代末的第一阶段,中非关系主要体现在反帝反殖、争取民族解放和巩固国家独立斗争中的相互支持。20世纪80年代的十年则可以说是中非关系发展的第二阶段,与这一时期我国实行的改革开放总方针相对应,经济因素在中非关系中的比重上升, 强 调 在 平 等 互 利 的 基 础 上 开 展 多 种 经 济技 术 合 作 。进 入 90 年 代 以 来 ,中非关系进入了全面合作的第三阶段。除继 续 加 强 中 非 经 贸 合 作 的 力 度 外 ,中 国 还 重视从政治、文化和教育等方面多渠道、多层面地全方位发展中非关系。2000年“中非合作论坛”的成立则为加强双边交流、沟通和合作建立了机制化的战略平台,中非关系在这一战略机制的强力助推下,呈现快速发展态势。如在政治层面,频繁进行的中非双边高层互访以及在国际重大问题和双边事务上的相互支持有力地推动着中非 新型战略伙伴关系的建立;在经济层面,中非贸易额在近十年里以年均35%的速度增长,从2000年的100亿美元上升到2008年的1068 亿美元。如今,中国已超过美国,成为仅次于欧盟的非洲第二大贸易伙伴。中国对非投资也从2001年的5000万美元提高到近年来的年均10亿美元。非洲还成为了中国第二大海外劳务工程承包市场。据悉,在非洲的中国人数目已近百万,在非洲开展经贸活动的中国公司已达1600 多家;在文化和教育层面,以弘扬中华文化和推动文化交流为宗旨的“孔子学院”在非洲雨后春笋般地建立,非洲来华留学生和各类人力资源培训班的数目也呈直线上升趋势……

  后发而勃兴的中非关系自然引发了非洲的兴奋和西方的关注。在非洲,虽然在一些非政府组织和媒体中也存在对中非关系的负面评述和报道,但积极和建设性的看法仍是主流。许多非洲的有识之士都认为,虽然中国也到非洲来开采自然资源,但与西方半个多世纪以来免费攫取的做法不同,中国还向非洲提供了基础设施建设和大量投资作为交换。中国在最近30年的快速发展已经雄辩地说明,非洲不能再把欧美模式看成解决问题的药方。非洲必须牢牢抓住中国的尾巴(当中国往前奔跑,非洲也能随之前进)。中国参与非洲事务是非洲发展的最新机遇(也可能是 最后一次的历史机遇),非洲必须牢牢抓住,决不能再错过。即使是普通民众,因其从中国的经贸活动以及基础设施建设中直接获益,也对中国人的到来持欢迎态度。今年2月,我在卢旺达调研时,曾偶遇一个在街头轮滑的非洲少年。他引用拿破仑的“中国睡狮论”比喻说,中国睡狮现在醒了,发出的怒吼引发的世界震动他在卢旺达首都基加利都感受到了。但这种震动的感觉很好,给停滞不动的生活带来了新的希望。坐落在基加利教育学院内的卢旺达“孔子学院”里,也有不少非洲学生在学习中文和中国文化。有非洲学生和我交流说,越来越多的中国公司到卢旺达来投资办厂,学会中文对于毕业后的就业找工作将会是一大竞争优势。记得有一位名叫博都多的学生学习中文特别用心和刻苦,他说他的哥哥就在一家中资公司工作,是哥哥用工资收入资助他上学。他哥哥公司里的中国同事都热情善良、工作勤奋。他翘着大拇指对我说,“中国人很好,真棒。”

  中非关系的快速发展自然也令那些把非洲视为自家后院的西方国家感到不安。感到中国人动了自己在非洲的“奶酪”的一些西方政客、媒体和非政府组织开始把聚光灯对准中国政府、公司乃至个体户在非洲的一举一动,用放大镜观察中国人在非洲可能产生的任何瑕疵。一些负面的公司个案被渲染成带普遍意义的国家行为,正常的资源开发合作被描绘成“资源掠夺”。中国公司参与全球化竞争,以高效低价竞标成功的项目被指是搞了暗箱操作或者政府的幕后支持,等等。另外,指责和批评还指向了中国政府一贯坚持的“不干涉内政原则”,认为这一原则实际上是对所谓“无赖”或“失败国家”的变相支持,不利于西方国家在非洲推动的民主、人权事业以及反专制和反腐败运动的进展。这一指责乍听起来似乎有些道理,但细细分析,这是一种牵强附会的联系。姑且不论任何一个国家的发展主要依靠自身努力(所谓“内因为主”和“外因为辅”),而且更重要的是,“民主”、“人权”和“良政”并不是建立在沙基上的海市蜃楼,不可能通过漂亮的口号和一味的鼓吹就能够在短时间内实现,它必须建立在经济发展以及人民教育水平和法制、民主意识提高的基础之上(实际上西方自身也是经过了数百年的努力才达到了今天的水平)。因此,中国在非洲大力发展经贸合作(仅中非贸易一项近年来对非洲经济增长的贡献率就达20%)、帮助非洲国家大规模开展基础设施建设、提高人民的生活水平、减少贫困,大力开展对非人力资源培训等等工作实际上就是在夯实非洲实现民主和良政的经济基础和人力资源基础。说到底,非洲的发展道路选择毕竟是掌握在非洲人民自己手中。 

  当然,我们在惊叹今日中非关系大发展的同时,更应当心存挑战意识和危机意识,在总结经验的同时更应当发现和反思不足和教训,为的是在国际风云激荡、非洲形势也不断出现新变化的环境下继续挖掘潜力,深化全方位合作的中非关系,把中非友好之船沿着和谐发展的方向驶向未来。现阶段,我们应当清醒地认识到,贸易量的快速提升并不意味着经济竞争力的同步提升,贸易结构、经贸合作中的技术和科技含量、环境保护和可持续发展能力、甚至有关法律和专家人才队伍的锻炼和培养等其他经济竞争力的指标要素都缺一不可。在提升中国在非洲的政治影响力、经济竞争力、道义感召力和外交亲和力这四个方面,我们都还有很大的潜力可挖,有很长的路要走。在许多方面,西方的一些经验和做法也需要我们放下身段来学习和借鉴,来自非洲的有益提醒和建议更需要我们认真倾听。

  事实上,中国在非洲到底还能走多远,很大程度上取决于我们对一些非洲关注的敏感问题(比如加强中国公司的属地化管理,当地劳工的雇佣不足问题、纺织品工业的竞争和保护非洲幼稚工业问题、中国商品的质量问题、提高中国公司的企业社会责任问题等)如何回应,如何在走入非洲的过程中真正从非洲的利益着想,切实做到、做好互利双赢。另外,加强中非间的相互了解也是决定中国在非洲到底还能走多远的重要因素。有一句阿拉伯谚语说得好,“独行走得快,相伴走得远”。笔者去年9月到赞比亚、埃塞俄比亚和加纳三国调研时,就有非洲学者表示, 由于西方在非洲数百年的殖民史和西方对非研究起步早,研究覆盖面广和比较深入,西方对非洲的了解以及非洲对西方的了解都要强于中非之间的相互了解。但他们也同时指出,虽然美欧等西方国家了解非洲,但不站在非洲一边为非洲说话。中国站在非洲一边,但遗憾的是,中国还不十分了解非洲。相互不了解就会容易产生猜疑,同时也为西方散布的种种攻击中国的言论(如“新殖民主义论”和“掠夺资源论”等)准备了土壤。非洲对中国国情的不了解还容易产生过高期望值得不到满足后的失望甚至怨恨情绪,而中国对非洲的不了解更是容易产生两种极端的思维误区:一是以为非洲处处是黄金,容易发财,钱好赚。结果没做好可行性调研就盲目投资;另则认为非洲就是贫困和动荡的代名词,不敢到非洲投资。 

  要加强中非间的相互了解不可能一蹴而就,必须在国内和非洲两边下功夫逐步培育。在国内,应设立“中非研究基金”,扶持和培养国内非洲研究机构和人才,使研究人员可以带着课题到对象国进行考察和调研;在非洲,则同样需要重视对研究机构和智库的投资。特别是要充分挖掘和发挥那些在中国留学过并已返回母国工作的非洲学者的潜力和桥梁作用。只有通过中非间不断加强的相互了解,相知相伴的中非关系才能走得更远。

  (作者:中国社会科学院西亚非洲研究所非洲室主任、研究员)

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

About Tendai Musakwa

Tendai Musakwa is a Zimbabwean journalist and researcher. Currently based in Shanghai, Tendai regularly translates Chinese news articles and microblog posts for the China Africa Project.

2 comments

  1. Dr. He Wenping should be congratulated and admired for her open, truthful and comprehensive contribution. Personally I agree totally and support her views and timely input. We are looking forward to the adventure ahead.
    Ferdie Mostert (facebook: AfricaChina Connect, twitter: @AfricaChinaLink)